O
Manteca
← Community
ZoningCommunity discussion

Batch GPA Sites 1-4 / school site

Manteca

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Opposed (8)Concerned (1)

At a glance

Public comments
9
Last 30 days
0

Last discussed Jun 18, 2026.

Public comments (9)

OpposedLakshmanJun 18, 2026

Said he got conflicting information from the city and accused the school district of repeatedly relocating school sites to benefit developers; strongly opposed the PQP-to-HDR change.

Planning Commission — June 18, 2026 · 48:30 →
OpposedSudakar SatiJun 18, 2026

Pressed the commission on acreage math, saying 0.82 acres is going to high-density residential instead of back to the school district, and urged rejection of the conversion.

Planning Commission — June 18, 2026 · 53:05 →
OpposedNeil ManyJun 18, 2026

An Oakwood Trails resident who said the school site is already too small for the homes being built and asked that surplus land go back to the school.

Planning Commission — June 18, 2026 · 56:42 →
OpposedVenkertJun 18, 2026

Said shrinking the Tara Park school site compromises safety buffers, drop-off loops, and kids' ability to walk to school.

Planning Commission — June 18, 2026 · 59:55 →
OpposedSheshrang TewariJun 18, 2026

Cited the MUSD-city agreement and ten-year clawback provision, arguing giving 0.82 acres to a developer violates general plan school-site policies.

Planning Commission — June 18, 2026 · 1:02:47 →
OpposedSrivass NambudriJun 18, 2026

Said the school land is insufficient for current and future residents and that converting leftover fire station land to HDR violates the agreement.

Planning Commission — June 18, 2026 · 1:05:23 →
OpposedUnidentified ResidentJun 18, 2026

Said Nile Garden and Veritas schools are already overcrowded, questioned the school district's 2027 timeline, and opposed both the HDR and commercial rezoning over traffic concerns.

Planning Commission — June 18, 2026 · 1:07:30 →
ConcernedUnidentified ResidentJun 18, 2026

Questioned where in the deed the portion of the conveyed acreage is designated for a developer, saying he could not find it.

Planning Commission — June 18, 2026 · 1:09:30 →
OpposedJVSJun 18, 2026

Claimed MUSD told him the school is delayed by city water issues, suggested the 0.82 acres is going to the Joshua apartments developer, and alleged impropriety.

Planning Commission — June 18, 2026 · 1:11:19 →